USPTO serial 76549557
EOS ENTERPRISE OUTPUT SOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3829887Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 10, 2010
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EOS ENTERPRISE OUTPUT SOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
RSD Roger Software Distribution S.A.
1227 Geneva, CH
Other trademarks owned by RSD Roger Software Distribution S.A.
RSD Roger Software Distribution S.A.
1227 Geneva, CH
Other trademarks owned by RSD Roger Software Distribution S.A.
RSD Roger Software Distribution S.A.
1227 Geneva, CH
Other trademarks owned by RSD Roger Software Distribution S.A.
1227 GENEVA, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Parker Livingston, Jr.
B PARKER LIVINGSTON JR BURNS DOANE SWECKER & MATHIS LLPPOST OFFICE BOX 1404ALEXANDRIA, VA 22313-1404UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for the capture, creation, storage, distribution, and management of data and documents for use in reports, excluding software in the fields of the production and distribution of power, electricity, petrol, gas, water, hydraulic or gas plants, environment protection, and the treatment and recycling of salvaged and waste materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1996 |
| 042 | (Based on 44(e)) Computer programming for others; computer software design for others; computer software development; computer systems analysis; customization of computer hardware and software; recovery of computer data; updating of computer software; all of the aforementioned services excluding the fields of the production and distribution of power, electricity, petrol, gas, water, hydraulic or gas plants, environment protection, and treatment and recycling of salvaged and waste materials | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by RSD Roger Software Distribution S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by RSD Roger Software Distribution S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by RSD Roger Software Distribution S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by RSD SA
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EOS ENTERPRISE OUTPUT SOLUTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 10, 2016 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 25, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 5, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 29, 2010 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 23, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 23, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |