Drawing for KETORIFIC

USPTO serial 76549570

KETORIFIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KETORIFIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

Lawrence E. Abelman Abelman, Frayne & Schwab666 Third Avenue10th FloorNEW YORK, NY 10112-3800

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005DIETARY SUPPLEMENTSACTIVE—
029SOY BASED SNACK FOODSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 18, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2011EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 18, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 26, 2011EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 20, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 17, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 17, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 20, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2010EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 18, 2010EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 18, 2010EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 8, 2010TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Apr 8, 2010OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 8, 2010OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 23, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 28, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 28, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 30, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance