USPTO serial 76549595
MOOTO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOOTO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Buchon, Kyunggi-Do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene Oak
610 S VAN NESS AVELOS ANGELES, CA 90005UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Sports Wear, Foot Wear, Head Gear | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |