USPTO serial 76549602
BRETONCEMSTONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRIFFIN, JAMES
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRETONCEMSTONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
31030 Castello di Godego (Treviso), IT
31030 Castello di Godego (Treviso), IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE PC901 N GLEBE RD11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | EQUIPMENT, MACHINES AND NUMERICAL CONTROL MACHINE TOOLS FOR FORMING, SIZING, POLISHING AND SHAPING OF MATERIALS AND PARTS THEREFOR; TRANSPORT SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF CONVEYORS AND HANDLING EQUIPMENT FOR MOVING AND CARRYING PRODUCTS AND MATERIALS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 17, 2010 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2008 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 19, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 14, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |