USPTO serial 76549659
NATRABOOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VENGROFF, MARILYN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NATRABOOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MURRAY GOULBURN CO-OPERATIVE CO. LIMITED
Brunswick, Victoria 3056, AU
Other trademarks owned by MURRAY GOULBURN CO-OPERATIVE CO. LIMITED
MURRAY GOULBURN CO-OPERATIVE CO. LIMITED
Brunswick, Victoria 3056, AU
Other trademarks owned by MURRAY GOULBURN CO-OPERATIVE CO. LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Bicks
MARK S BICKS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MURRAY GOULBURN CO-OPERATIVE CO. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MURRAY GOULBURN CO-OPERATIVE CO. LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named NATRABOOST
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 19, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 11, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 26, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |