Drawing for NATRALIFE

USPTO serial 76549660

NATRALIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VENGROFF, MARILYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATRALIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark S. Bicks

MARK S BICKS ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO1300 19TH ST NW STE 600WASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS AND DIETETIC SUBSTANCES ADAPTED FOR MEDICAL USE, NAMELY, DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS INCLUDING PROTEIN POWDERS MADE FROM MILK, MILK PRODUCTS, AND MILK FRACTIONS, TO BE MARKETED SOLELY TO MANUFACTURERS AND WHOLESALE CHANNELS OF TRADE AND NOT TO RETAIL CUSTOMERSACTIVE—
029MILK, POWDERED MILK, CHEESES, AND BUTTERACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 9, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 25, 2008EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 25, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 22, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 22, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 30, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 15, 2007ICNANOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED—
May 15, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 9, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Feb 9, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Sep 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 11, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 14, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 24, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 6, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 6, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance