USPTO serial 76549716
ATOMIC KITTEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3942475Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 12, 2011
- Examiner
- PINO, BRIAN
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ATOMIC KITTEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
London, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donna J. Bunton
DONNA J. BUNTON NIXON & VANDERHYE901 N. GLEBE ROAD11TH FLOORARLINGTON, VA 22203Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | (Based on 44(e)) POSTERS, STICKERS AND FANZINES RELATING TO APPLICANT'S MUSIC GROUP | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 035 | (Based on 44(e)) ONLINE RETAIL STORE SERVICES AND MAIL ORDER SERVICES FEATURING PROMOTIONAL AND SOUVENIR ITEMS RELATING TO THE APPLICANT'S MUSIC GROUP | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | (Based on 44(e)) MUSIC GROUP ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, LIVE PERFORMANCES BY A MUSIC GROUP | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton, Natasha
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton, Natasha
- Other trademarks owned by McClarnon, Elizabeth
- Other trademarks owned by McClarnon, Elizabeth
- Other trademarks owned by McClarnon, Elizabeth
- Other trademarks owned by Frost, Jenny
- Other trademarks owned by Frost, Jenny
- Other trademarks owned by Frost, Jenny
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton, Natasha
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton, Natasha
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton, Natasha
- Other trademarks owned by McClarnon, Elizabeth
- Other trademarks owned by McClarnon, Elizabeth
- Other trademarks owned by McClarnon, Elizabeth
- Other trademarks owned by Frost, Jenny
- Other trademarks owned by Frost, Jenny
- Other trademarks owned by Frost, Jenny
- Other trademarks owned by Hamilton, Natasha
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ATOMIC KITTEN
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 12, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2011 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 20, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 17, 2011 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 22, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 1, 2009 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 23, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 31, 2009 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 18, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 17, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 20, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |