Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 76550226?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/76550226. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns NOHO TRANSIT N.Y.C.?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 76550226, the listed owner(s) include: Gropius Design Purchasing Group, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 76550226?

Serial number 76550226 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark NOHO TRANSIT N.Y.C.. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of NOHO TRANSIT N.Y.C.?

NOHO TRANSIT N.Y.C. (76550226) currently shows USPTO status code 614 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover NOHO TRANSIT N.Y.C.?

The public record lists International Classes: 035. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 76550226

NOHO TRANSIT N.Y.C.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614

Filing date: Oct 9, 2003
Status date: Feb 21, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
Law office: PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOHO TRANSIT N.Y.C.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Gropius Design Purchasing Group, Inc.
East Elmhurst, NY
Other trademarks owned by Gropius Design Purchasing Group, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN G. WARD,Jr.

JOHN G WARD JR1015 SURF AVEBROOKLYN, NY 11224UNITED STATES

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
035	Retail sportswear and footwear stores	ACTIVE	Apr 10, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Feb 20, 2008	PETD	PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED	—
Nov 27, 2007	PINM	INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED	—
Oct 30, 2007	APET	ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF	—
Oct 19, 2007	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Oct 19, 2007	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Sep 6, 2007	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 6, 2007	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2007	RCCK	SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION	—
Dec 13, 2006	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Oct 6, 2006	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
May 21, 2006	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Nov 3, 2005	RCSC	REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED	—
Apr 26, 2005	CNSL	LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED	—
Apr 26, 2005	CNSL	SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN	—
Apr 7, 2005	PETG	PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED	—
Jan 3, 2005	PETR	PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED	—
Jan 3, 2005	MAIL	PAPER RECEIVED	—
Nov 4, 2004	MAB2	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 4, 2004	ABN2	ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE	The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2004	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2004	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—