Drawing for ABSOLUT CUT

USPTO serial 76550276

ABSOLUT CUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ABSOLUT CUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joanne Ludovici-Lint

JOANNE LUDOVICI-LINT MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY600 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016publications and printed matter, namely, books, magazines and brochures in the fields of Sweden, music, arts, movies, culture, parties, beverages, food and sales and marketing of beverages; recipe brochures and booklets; writing instruments; paper napkins; posters; paper coasters; paper banners; paper gift bags and boxes; stickers; decals; folders; postcards; cardboard boxes; drawing paper; photographs; stationery; printed instructional and teaching material in the fields of Sweden, music, arts, movies, culture, parties, beverages, food and sales and marketing of beverages; plastic bags and paper boxes for packaging, merchandise bags, paper bags, and fabric gift bags; paper coat hanger tagsACTIVE—
021household or kitchen utensils and containers and barware, not of previous metal or coated therewith, namely, beverage glassware, serving ware for serving food, beverage trays, spice shakers, beverage stirrers, beverage shakers, portable beverage coolers, ice buckets, drink pourers, namely, pouring spouts for household, bar and restaurant use, bowls, glass coasters; glass jars for storing tips, serving trays not of precious metal; candle holders not of precious metal, bottles sold empty; unworked or semi-worked glass, except glass used in building; and menu holders in the nature of menu display standsACTIVE—
024textile goods, namely, towels and napkinsACTIVE—
025clothing, namely, t-shirts, shirts, scarves, ties, slacks, shorts, jeans, coats, footwear, socks, sport jackets, jackets, sweaters, belts, dresses, skirts, aprons, hosiery, beachwear, swimwear, ski suits, ski wear and underwear; headwear, namely, hats and caps; and bandanasACTIVE—
032beers; non-alcoholic malt-based beverages; mineral, flavored and aerated waters; carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; sports drinks; energy drinks; fruit and fruit-flavored drinks; fruit juices; syrups and preparations for making beers, non-alcoholic malt-based beverages, mineral, flavored and aerated waters, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks, sports drinks, energy drinks, fruit and fruit-flavored drinks, and fruit juices; and non-alcoholic beverage mixes for making non-alcoholic cocktails and alcoholic cocktails, beers, non-alcoholic malt-based beverages, mineral, flavored and aerated waters, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks, sports drinks, energy drinks, fruit and fruit-flavored drinks, and fruit juicesACTIVE—
043Services for providing food and drink, namely, restaurant, bar, cocktail lounge and cafe servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 10, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 18, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 28, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 31, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 4, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 4, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 3, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 6, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 21, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Mar 28, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 26, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 4, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance