USPTO serial 76550277
LEVEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEVEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joanne Ludovici-Lint
JOANNE LUDOVICI-LINT MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY600 13TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Beers; non-alcoholic malt-based beverages; mineral, flavored and aerated waters; carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks; sports drinks; energy drinks; fruit and fruit-flavored drinks; fruit juices; syrups and preparations for making beers, non-alcoholic malt-based beverages, mineral, flavored and aerated waters, carbonated and non-carbonated soft drinks, sports drinks, energy drinks, fruit and fruit-flavored drinks, and fruit juices; and non-alcoholic cocktail mixes | ACTIVE | — |
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely, flavored brewed malt beverages, prepared alcoholic and wine cocktails, and alcoholic malt coolers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by V&S VIN & SPRIT AKTIEBOLAG
- Other trademarks owned by V&S VIN & SPRIT AKTIEBOLAG (PUBL)
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named LEVEL
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 11, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 12, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 18, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |