Drawing for PEACE ANGEL

USPTO serial 76550309

PEACE ANGEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PEACE ANGEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Patick J. Jennings

Patrick J. Jennings PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP1200 Seventeenth Street, NWWashington, DC 20036-3006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009EYEWEAR, NAMELY EYEGLASSES, SUNGLASSES, EYEGLASS FRAMES, CASES FOR EYEGLASSES AND SUNGLASSES, PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODSACTIVE—
014WATCHES, CLOCKS, WATCH BANDS AND STRAPS, WATCH BRACELETS, WATCH CHAINS, WATCH CASES, WATCH DIALS; PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR ALL THE AFORESAID GOODS; STANDS FOR CLOCKS; PRESENTATION CASES FOR WATCHES AND CLOCKS; JEWELRYACTIVE—
018CASES, NAMELY BUSINESS CARD CASES, DOCUMENT CASES, LIPSTICK CASES, TOILETRY CASES SOLD EMPTY; BEACH BAGS, HANDBAGS, PURSES IN THE NATURE OF HOLDALLS, WAIST-MOUNTED CARRYALLS, SUITCASES, TRAVELING BAGS AND CASES, VALISES, BRIEFCASES, BRIEFCASE-TYPE PORTFOLIOS, ATTACHE CASES, WALLETS, LUGGAGE, PURSES, BILLFOLDS, UMBRELLAS, PARASOLS, CREDIT CARD CASES AND HOLDERS, BACKPACKS, SCHOOL BAGS, SATCHELS, TOTE BAGS, ALL-PURPOSE SPORT AND ATHLETIC BAGS, BOOK BAGS, DUFFLE BAGS, MONEY BAGS, SHOULDER BAGS; SHOULDER BELTS, KEY CASES, CHEQUE-BOOK CASES; PARTS AND FITTINGS FOR THE AFORESAID GOODSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING NAMELY, JACKETS, TROUSERS, PANTS, JEANS, SKIRTS, COATS, JUMPERS, T-SHIRTS, SWEATSHIRTS, SHIRTS,VESTS, WAISTCOATS, TIGHTS, BRASSIERES, UNDERWEAR, SCARVES, NECKTIES; SOCKS, LEGGINGS, STOCKINGS, HATS, WRISTBANDS, HEADBANDS, BELTS, FOOTWEAR AND HEAD WEARACTIVE—
035BUSINESS CONSULTING, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION SERVICES FOR OTHERS;PREPARING MAILING LISTS; MARKET ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH SERVICES FOR OTHERS; WINDOW DRESSING AND MERCHANDISE DISPLAY SERVICES FOR OTHERS; RETAIL,WHOLESALE AND DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES, INCLUDING SUCH SERVICES PROVIDED VIA THE INTERNET OR OTHER GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKS, IN THE FIELD OF WATCHES AND CLOCKS, EYEWEAR, COSMETICS, CLOTHING, FOOTWEAR, HEADWEAR, BAGS, BELTS, UMBRELLAS, LEATHER PRODUCTS AND FASHION ACCESSORIESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2020MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 24, 2020ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2020RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 6, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 11, 2019RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 10, 2019ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 11, 2018RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 1, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 23, 2017RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 17, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 11, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 10, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 6, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 13, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 5, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 30, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 30, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 24, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 24, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 24, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 22, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 22, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 18, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 22, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 20, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 18, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 18, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 18, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 14, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 5, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 21, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 20, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 18, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance