USPTO serial 76550443
Serial No. 76550443
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3143878Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 19, 2006
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76550443?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Port Louis, MU
MITTAL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Cybercity, Ebene, MU
MITTAL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
Cybercity, Ebene, MU
MITTAL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
PORT LOUIS, MU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave. N.W.Suite #1100Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | IRON, STEEL OR FERROUS ALLOY PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS AND OTHER SHAPES FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE, APPLIANCE, CONSTRUCTION, ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, OIL AND GAS, MINING, RAILWAY, SHIPBUILDING, ENERGY, AGRICULTURE, HOUSING, AND PACKAGING INDUSTRIES; IRON ORE; BLOOMS AND METAL MATERIALS FOR RAILWAY TRACKS; METAL BUILDING MATERIALS NAMELY BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS, BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS, SECTIONS AND OTHER SHAPES; NON-ELECTRIC CABLES, WIRES AND ROPES OF IRON, STEEL AND FERROUS ALLOY; IRONMONGERY; NAILS; TEMPERED STEEL; METAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS, BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS, SECTIONS AND OTHER SHAPES; DIRECTLY REDUCED IRON; DIRECT REDUCED IRON; DRI; IRON, STEEL, FERROUS ALLOY PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS AND SECTIONS; GALVANIZED STEEL, TIN PLATE, COLOUR COATED STEEL, ALUMINUM COATED STEEL, DRI, DIRECTLY REDUCED IRON OR DIRECT REDUCED IRON PRODUCTS NAMELY BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS, BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS, SECTIONS AND OTHER SHAPES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | GALVANIZATION SERVICES FOR DIRECTLY REDUCING IRON; CONTRACT MANUFACTURING IN THE FIELD OF STEEL; STEEL TEMPERING; STEEL CASTING; CONTRACT MANUFACTURING IN THE FIELD OF METAL; METAL TEMPERING; METAL CASTING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ispat Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by MITTAL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MITTAL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by MITTAL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 4, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |