USPTO serial 76550445
LNM GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3690890Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 6, 2009
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LNM GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker Hostetler LLPSuite 11001050 Connecticut Ave. N.W.Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | IRON, STEEL OR FERROUS ALLOY PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS AND OTHER SHAPES FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE, APPLIANCE, CONSTRUCTION, ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, OIL AND GAS, MINING, RAILWAY, SHIPBUILDING, ENERGY, AGRICULTURE, HOUSING, AND PACKAGING INDUSTRIES; IRON ORE; BLOOMS AND METAL MATERIALS FOR RAILWAY TRACKS; METAL BUILDING MATERIALS, NAMELY, BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS, BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS, SECTIONS AND OTHER SHAPES; NON-ELECTRIC CABLES, WIRES AND ROPES OF IRON, STEEL AND FERROUS ALLOY; NAILS; TEMPERED STEEL; METAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS, BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS, SECTIONS AND OTHER SHAPES; DIRECTLY REDUCED IRON; DIRECT REDUCED IRON (DRI); IRON, STEEL, FERROUS ALLOY PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS AND SECTIONS; GALVANIZED STEEL, TIN PLATE, COLOUR COATED STEEL, ALUMINUM COATED STEEL, DRI, DIRECTLY REDUCED IRON OR DIRECT REDUCED IRON PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS, BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS, SECTIONS AND OTHER SHAPES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 040 | GALVANIZATION SERVICES FOR DIRECTLY REDUCING IRON; CONTRACT MANUFACTURING IN THE FIELD OF STEEL; STEEL TEMPERING; STEEL CASTING; CONTRACT MANUFACTURING IN THE FIELD OF METAL; METAL TEMPERING; METAL CASTING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LNM Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by LNM Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks owned by LNM Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named LNM GROUP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 13, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 6, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 21, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 1, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 18, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 22, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 22, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 20, 2008 | ADBS | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS REQUESTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2008 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 7, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |