USPTO serial 76550446
ISPAT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISPAT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Tidman
Mark H. Tidman Baker Hostetler LLP1050 Connecticut Ave. N.W.Suite #1100Washington, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | IRON, STEEL OR FERROUS ALLOY PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS AND OTHER SHAPES FOR USE IN THE AUTOMOTIVE, APPLIANCE, CONSTRUCTION, ELECTRICAL MACHINERY, OIL AND GAS, MINING, RAILWAY, SHIPBUILDING, ENERGY, AGRICULTURE, HOUSING, AND PACKAGING INDUSTRIES; IRON ORE; BLOOMS AND METAL MATERIALS FOR RAILWAY TRACKS; METAL BUILDING MATERIALS NAMELY BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS, BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS, SECTIONS AND OTHER SHAPES; NON-ELECTRIC CABLES, WIRES AND ROPES OF IRON, STEEL AND FERROUS ALLOY; IRONMONGERY; NAILS; TEMPERED STEEL; METAL PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS, BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS, SECTIONS AND OTHER SHAPES; DIRECTLY REDUCED IRON; DIRECT REDUCED IRON; DRI; IRON, STEEL, FERROUS ALLOY PRODUCTS IN THE FORM OF BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS AND SECTIONS; GALVANIZED STEEL, TIN PLATE, COLOUR COATED STEEL, ALUMINUM COATED STEEL, DRI, DIRECTLY REDUCED IRON OR DIRECT REDUCED IRON PRODUCTS NAMELY BLOCKS, PLATES, PIPES, TUBES, SHEETS, STRIPS, FOILS, RODS, WIRES, COILS, BEAMS, SLABS, BLOOMS, BILLETS, SECTIONS AND OTHER SHAPES | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | GALVANIZATION SERVICES FOR DIRECTLY REDUCING IRON; CONTRACT MANUFACTURING IN THE FIELD OF STEEL; STEEL TEMPERING; STEEL CASTING; CONTRACT MANUFACTURING IN THE FIELD OF METAL; METAL TEMPERING; METAL CASTING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MITTAL STEEL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Ispat Technologies Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named ISPAT
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |