USPTO serial 76550537
MAYNE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAYNE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MELBOURNE, VICTORIA, AU
Melbourne, Victoria, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura J. Winston, Robert Schaffer, Andrew Baum, Paul Fields, Robert S. Weisbein, Amy J. Benjamin, Eric A. Prager, Karin Segall and Abigail Rubinstein
Laura J. Winston, Robert Schaffer, Andrew Baum, Pa Darby & Darby PCP.O. Box 770Church Street StationNew York, NY 10008-0770Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS AND SUBSTANCES FOR HUMAN USE, AND PHARMACEUTICAL, VETERINARY AND SANITARY PREPARATIONS, NAMELY ANALGESICS AND ANTI-FLAMMATORY AGENTS, ANTHELMINTICS, ANTIARRHYTHMIC AGENTS, ANTIBACTERIAL AGENTS, ANTICOAGULANTS, ANTIDEPRESSANTS, ANTIDIABETIC AGENTS, ANTIEPITEPTICS, ANTIFUNGAL AGENTS, ANTIGOUT AGENTS, ANTIHISTAMINES, ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS, ANTIMALARIALS, ANTIMUSCARINIC AGENTS, ANTIMYCOBACTERIAL AGENTS, ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS, ANTIPROTOZOAL AGENTS, ANTITHYROID AGENTS, ANTI VIRAL AGENTS, ANXIOLYTIC SEDATIVES HYPNOTICS AND NEUROLEPTICS, ASTRINGENTS, BETA-ADRENOCEPTOR BLOCKING AGENTS, BLOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY WHOLE BLOOD, BLOOD CLOTTING FACTORS, AND BLOOD COMPONENTS, AND SUBSTITUTES, NAMELY COMPOUNDS USED AS SUBSTITUTES FOR BLOOD COMPONENTS, CARDIAC INOTRPIC AGENTS, CHELATING AGENTS, ANTIDOTES AND ANTAGONISTS, CORTICOSTEROIDS, COUGH SUPPRESSANTS, EXPECTORANTS AND MUCOLYTICS, DERMATOLOGICAL AGENTS, ALL-PURPOSE DISINFECTANTS, DIURETICS, DOPAMINERGIC ANTIPARKINSONIAN AGENTS, ELECTROLYTES, ENZYMES, ERGOT ALKALOIDS AND DERIVATIVES, GASTRO-INTESTINAL AGENTS, GENERAL ANAESTHETICS, GLYCEROL GLYCOL AND MACROGOLS, HAEMOSTATICS, HYPOTHALAMIC AND PITUITARY HORMONES, IMMUNOLOGICAL AGENTS, IODINE AND IODIDES, IRON AND IRON COMPOUNDS, LIPID REGULATING AGENTS, LOCAL ANAESTHETICS, MUSCLE RELAXANTS, NUTRITIONAL AGENTS, NAMELY AMINO ACIDS, CARBOHYDRATES, OILS, TRACE ELEMENTS, SWEETENERS, VITAMINS AND MINERALS, HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS FOR NUTRITIONAL, HEALTH CARE AND MEDICINAL PURPOSES, NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL USE, OPIOID ANALGESICS, PARASYMPATHOMIMETICS, PARATHYROID CALCITONIN AND BIPHOSPHONATES, PRESERVATIVES SUBSTANCES FOR PHARMACEUTICALS, PROSTAGLANDINS, RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS, SEX HORMONES, STIMULANTS AND ANORETICS, SYMPATHOMIMETICS, THYROID AGENTS, VASODILATORS, WATER FOR PHARMACEUTICAL PURPOSES, XANTHINES; ANTISEPTICS, VITAMIN PREPARATIONS; PROTECTIVE CREAMS FOR MEDICAL USE, FOR USE IN THE TREATMENT OF CUTS, ABRASIONS, INSECT BITES AND THE LIKE, BABY CREAMS WHICH SOOTHE, PROTECT AND AID HEALING OF NAPPY RASH AND SIMILAR AILMENTS; ALL-PURPOSE DISINFECTANTS; INJECTORS IN THE NATURE OF PRE-FILLED SYRINGES CONTAINING MORPHINE USED TO TREAT PAIN | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 17, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 2, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2005 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |