Drawing for SPEED.TV

USPTO serial 76550538

SPEED.TV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRASER, RICHARD
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPEED.TV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James E. Brunton

LOUIS F FILIPESCU700 N BRAND, STE 860GLENDALE, CA 91203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035on-line retail store services featuring home improvement supplies and office suppliesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2005MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 7, 2005ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 7, 2005OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 7, 2005OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 6, 2004ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 9, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 20, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 14, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 27, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 23, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 18, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 18, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 22, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 19, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance