USPTO serial 76550673
D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Palo Alto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Palo Alto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bret Field
DOCKETING DEPT BOZICEVIC, FIELD & FRANCIS LLP1900 UNIVERSITY AVE STE 200EAST PALO ALTO, CA 94303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in digital video manipulation; devices for processing digital video, namely digital video processors; computers for use in digital video manipulation; digital video cameras | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Digital imaging services for individuals and groups; digital imaging services for the entertainment and amusement industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Educational services, namely, arranging and conducting classes and seminars for individuals and groups in the field of digital video manipulation; amusement arcades that use digital video in its games; providing an electronic database on the internet in the field of education or entertainment, namely the use of digital video manipulation in the entertainment and education fields | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Scientific research services for studies of physical phenomena or behavioral phenomena such as learning, social interaction and other behaviors, or in any temporal process where digital video manipulation is useful, namely, scientific observations and experiments; providing an electronic database on the internet in the field of scientific research services | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Monitoring of security systems using digital video manipulation for the protection of property and individuals; providing an electronic database on the internet in the field of security and surveillance services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
- Other trademarks owned by Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, The
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named D
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 3, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |