USPTO serial 76550857
TECHNIPPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3516813Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 14, 2008
- Examiner
- BUTLER, MIDGE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TECHNIPPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
New York, NY
Miami Beach, FL
Miami Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Fred D. Zemel
FRED D. ZEMEL SCARINCI HOLLENBECKPO BOX 07901100 VALLEY BROOK AVENUELYNDHURST, NJ 07071-0790Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, live performances by a musical band; entertainment services, namely, providing live performances by a musical band via the Internet; musical composition for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 12, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 10, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2008 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PGSU | PETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2007 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Aug 30, 2007 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 19, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 26, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |