Drawing for THINKING CAP

USPTO serial 76551011

THINKING CAP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAITO, KIM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - LEGAL INSTRUMENTS EXAMINER

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THINKING CAP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Devon Ryning

DEVON RYNING MILLER NASH LLP4400 TWO UN SQ601 UN STSEATTLE, WA 98101-2352

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Software services, namely, providing training in the use and operation of computer software for creating educational courses,namely online educational coursesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 19, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 19, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 22, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance