Drawing for ROYAL ELASTICS

USPTO serial 76551037

ROYAL ELASTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROYAL ELASTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lee D. Green

LEE D GREEN31248 OAK CRST DRWESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA 91361UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyeglasses and sunglassesACTIVE—
014WristwatchesACTIVE—
018Backpacks, rucksacks, waistpacks, and tote bagsACTIVE—
024Towels and handkerchiefsACTIVE—
025Shoes, t-shirts, shirts, jackets, pants, coats, vests, skirts, sweaters, underwear, fleece tops and bottoms, shorts, pajamas, robes, hats, caps visors, socks, belts, and necktiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 14, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 28, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 21, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 20, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 14, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 14, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 15, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 3, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 8, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance