USPTO serial 76551209
BIZYMAIL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 19, 2005
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIZYMAIL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Rancho Santa Fe, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Samuel Kelsall V
2921 ROOSEVELT STCARLSBAD, CA 92008UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Communication by electronic computer terminals; Communication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents among users of computers; Data communication by electronic email; Delivery of messages by electronic transmission; Electronic mail services; Electronic message sending; Electronic message transmission; Electronic message system, namely, the recording and subsequent transmission of voice messages by telephone; Electronic store-and-forward messaging; Electronic transmission of messages and data; E-mail forwarding services; Providing e-mail services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 8, 2003 |
| 042 | Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web site for others; Creating and maintaining web storefronts; Computer services, namely, redirecting electronic mail to changed personal electronic address | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 8, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of Business Applications LTD., comprising Richard Brown and Rebecca Brown both U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of Business Applications LTD., comprising Richard Brown and Rebecca Brown both U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks owned by The Trustees of Business Applications LTD., comprising Richard Brown and Rebecca Brown both U.S. citizen
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BIZYMAIL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |