USPTO serial 76551247
P
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRENCH, CURTIS W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with P?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Chester Rothstein, Esq.; Morton Amster, Daniel Ebenstein, Philip H. Gottfried, Michael J. Berger, Neil M. Zipkin, Anthony F. Lo Cicero, Kenneth P. George, Abraham Kasdan, Ira E. Silfin, Chester Rothstein, Craig J. Arnold, Kenneth Bernstein, Charles R. Mac
CHESTER ROTHSTEIN ESQ MORTON AMSTER AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN LLP90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Pepe Jeans London, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Pepe Jeans London, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named P
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 9, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |