Drawing for NIFLOCK

USPTO serial 76551289

NIFLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NIFLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael A. Grow

MICHAEL A GROW ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007structural parts for electric washing machines for clothes, vacuum cleaners, blenders and sewing machines, namely, friction dampers, mechanical adjuster arms and levers, torque limiters, plastic torque limiters and clutches; power staplersACTIVE—
012automobile parts and accessories, namely, vibration dampers, rod holders, plastic rod holders, linkage bushing, shaft connectors, hood bumper rubbers, bushings, cup holders, trailer hitches, card holders, sunglass holders; ashtrays, caddies and display hinges for car navigation units, and hook and fuel sub tanks; plastic rod holders and plastic torque limiters for automobilesACTIVE—
020plastic fasteners, namely, threaded fasteners, bolts, screws and rivets; plastic clips for use with door trim; plastic valves other than for machine parts; plastic grommets; plastic rivets; plastic clamps; adjustable arms for office furniture; height adjusters for furniture and partitioning belts for organizing and defining work areas; partitioning belts, namely, office partitions for organizing and defining work areas; hinged plastic caps; cabinets; nonmetal locks for sash windows; nonmetal corner pieces for doors; nonmetal caps for liquid containersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 29, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 29, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 14, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 18, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 6, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 27, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 24, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance