CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for µ-CHIP PARTNER KIT

USPTO serial 76551460

µ-CHIP PARTNER KIT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with µ-CHIP PARTNER KIT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle C. Burke

MICHELLE C BURKE MCDERMOTT, WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE ST STE 4400CHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated circuit chips; computer hardware, peripherals and computer software for programming and reading integrated circuit chips; electronic reader and antenna for integrated circuit chips; inlets, namely, integrated circuit chips with external antenna, and tags in which integrated circuit chips are embedded; computer cables; Universal AC adapters; cable connectors for antennas; electrical connectors for antennas; carrying handles for antennas; integrated circuit cards; compact disc players and digital videodisc players for reading integrated circuit chips for the purpose of prevention of pirated compact disc or digital videodisc; compact disc and digital videodisc embedded with integrated circuit chips; circuit board embedded with integrated circuit chipsACTIVE—
042Development and design of computer hardware and software; providing computer network systems integration services; evaluation and consultation services in the fields of development and design of computer hardware and software and computer network systems integration servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 12, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 21, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 21, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 15, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 8, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 5, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 30, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 25, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 20, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance