Drawing for DIVINE PHYSICS HOLISTIC LIFESTYLES

USPTO serial 76551596

DIVINE PHYSICS HOLISTIC LIFESTYLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NELSON, EDWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIVINE PHYSICS HOLISTIC LIFESTYLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David N. Schachter

DAVID N SCHACHTER SHERMAN & HOWARD L.L.C.633 17TH ST STE 3000DENVER, CO 80202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services in the field of health, nutrition, wellness and cosmetic preparations and products and printed literature materials on the subjects sold therewithACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, seminars and workshops providing information, education and training in the fields of medicine, social, religious, spiritual, political, environmental, health, wellness and cultural issuesACTIVE—
042Research services in the fields of integrated medicine, social, religious, spiritual, political, environmental, health, wellness, stress, foods, nutritional and cultural issuesACTIVE—
044Psychological counseling by means of meditation, cultural, medical and hygienic services in the nature of a facility offering massage, chiropractic, naturopathic, nutritional and holistic medical services, homeopathy and energy medicine; psychotherapy services; and health spa services, namely, cosmetic body care servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 6, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 6, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 2, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 10, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 20, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 19, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 21, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 18, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance