USPTO serial 76551611
THE ULTIMATE LINER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALTREE, NICHOLAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE ULTIMATE LINER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward A. Pennington
EDWARD A PENNINGTON SWIDLER BERLIN SHEREFF FRIEDMAN, LLP3000 K ST NWSTE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20007-5116Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | plastic garbage bags | ACTIVE | Dec 10, 1973 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 8, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 22, 2007 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CRML | CORRESPONDENCE MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2005 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 29, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |