Drawing for PERFECTING THE ART OF THE HEALING SCIENCES

USPTO serial 76551614

PERFECTING THE ART OF THE HEALING SCIENCES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PERFECTING THE ART OF THE HEALING SCIENCES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTEN M. ENGLISH

CHRISTEN M ENGLISH C/O DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005MEDICATED TOPICAL TREATMENTS NAMELY, CREAMS AND LOTIONS FOR THE TREATMENT OF PSORIASISACTIVEJul 25, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 20, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 19, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 11, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 11, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 13, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 1, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 17, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Aug 17, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 10, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 16, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 16, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 14, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 8, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 17, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 17, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 25, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 23, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance