USPTO serial 76551640
SHEBANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SHEBANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, M3B 3M1, CA
NEW YORK, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald L. Dennison
DONALD L DENNISON Loeb & Loeb LLP10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200Los Angeles, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care, bath and cosmetic products, namely, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, blush, lip liner, brow pencils, lipstick, lip gloss, lip balms, makeup brushes, makeup sponges, makeup puffs, cosmetic and lip colour palettes, undereye concealers, foundations, face powders, soaps, bath oil, moisturizer, fragrances and perfumes, deodorants, talcum powder, shampoo, conditioner, hair styling gels and spray, nail polish, bronzer, sun tan lotion, sun screens, facial cleanser and facial toner | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 16, 2010 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2010 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2009 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 21, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 19, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 2, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — |