USPTO serial 76551825
CANLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROSSMAN, MARY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CANLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
COMPUTRONICS CORPORATION LIMITED
BENTLEY, WESTERN AUSTRALIA, AU
COMPUTRONICS CORPORATION LIMITED
BENTLEY, WESTERN AUSTRALIA, AU
Bentley, Western Australia 6102, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel H. Bliss
DANIEL H BLISS BLISS MCGLYNN, PC2075 W BIG BEAVER RD STE 600TROY, MI 49084UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC CONTROL, MONITORING, INFORMATION SENSING AND INFORMATION DISPLAY SYSTEMS FOR USE IN AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY, COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE, ELECTRICAL CONTROLLERS, ELECTRICAL AND OPTICAL SENSORS; AGRICULTURAL VEHICLE MOUNTED ELECTRONIC CROP ANALYSIS SYSTEMS COMPRISING COMPUTER HARDWARE, COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR ANALYZING VOLUMES OF CROPS COLLECTED AND DYNAMICALLY CONTROLLING AMOUNTS AND TYPES OF FERTILIZER AND OTHER CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS TO BE APPLIED TO SPECIFIC GEOGRAPHIC AREAS; ELECTRONIC CONTROL, MONITORING, INFORMATION SENSING AND INFORMATION DISPLAY SYSTEMS COMPRISING A COMPUTER OPERATING IN CONJUNCTION WITH AGRICULTURAL MACHINERY MOUNTED TO AGRICULTURAL COMBINE HARVESTERS, AGRICULTURAL TRACTORS, AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENTS, AGRICULTURAL MACHINES, AND AGRICULTURAL HARVESTING MACHINERY; FIELD DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS FOR AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONS COMPRISING COMMUNICATIONS SERVERS AND COMMUNICATIONS SOFTWARE FOR CONNECTING COMPUTER NETWORK USERS TO THE COMMUNICATIONS SERVERS; SOFTWARE FOR THE PRESENTATION, MANAGEMENT, AND ANALYSIS OF AGRICULTURAL DATA, FOR USE BY FARMERS; VARIABLE-RATE IRRIGATION CONTROL SYSTEMS AND GPS GUIDANCE AND AUTO STEERING SYSTEMS FOR AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONS; SENSORS AND CONTROLS FOR AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONS FOR YIELD MAPPING, SOIL SAMPLING AND VARIABLE RATE SPRAYING, SPREADING AND SEEDING; AND DATA TRANSFER HARDWARE TO TRANSFER DATA EITHER MANUALLY OR ELECTRONICALLY BETWEEN COMPUTERS FOR AGRICULTURAL APPLICATIONS | ABANDONED | Apr 9, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTRONICS CORPORATION LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by COMPUTRONICS CORPORATION LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Computronics Holdings Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CANLINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 25, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 10, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 24, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |