USPTO serial 76551905
FEMLAB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 23, 2007
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FEMLAB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Everett, WA
Everett, WA
Everett, WA
EVERETT, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Taro Kusunose
Taro Kusunose Lasher Holzapfel Sperry & Ebberson601 Union StreetSuite 2600Seattle, WA 98101-4000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical diagnosis equipment, namely, vaginitis test kit comprised of test cassette, swab, buffer bottle and insert | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 28, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 17, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2007 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 17, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 4, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 8, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 9, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |