Drawing for THE HEALTHCARE FACTLINE

USPTO serial 76552081

THE HEALTHCARE FACTLINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PAPPAS, MATTHEW
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE HEALTHCARE FACTLINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis M. Heidelberger

LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED SMITH LLP2500 ONE LIBERTY PL1650 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035PROVIDING INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS; BUSINESS MARKETING CONSULTING SERVICES; ADVERTISING AND PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS VIA TELEPHONE VOICE RECOGNITION AND RESPONSE SYSTEMS OR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORKACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 22, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 2, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 21, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 10, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Nov 29, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 10, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance