USPTO serial 76552094
SUPERSWEEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3621263Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 19, 2009
- Examiner
- ERVIN, INGA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPERSWEEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Richibucto, New Brunswick, CA
Richibucto, New Brunswick, CA
Richibucto, New Brunswick, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cindy L. Caditz
KENNETH L WILTON SEYFARTH SHAW LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 3300LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Chimney brushes and chimney brush rods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 19, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 13, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 7, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2009 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 6, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2008 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 2, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 26, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 30, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 30, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 19, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |