USPTO serial 76552105
BEST OF HONOLULU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3140847Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 12, 2006
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BEST OF HONOLULU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott K. Saiki
SCOTT K SAIKI BICKERTON SAUNDERS & DANG745 FORT ST STE 801HONOLULU, HI 96813UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | NEWSPAPER SECTION FEATURING THE RESULTS OF A READER'S SURVEY OF CONSUMER CHOICES, AND OF AWARDS PRESENTATIONS FOR CITY LIFE, CIVIC AFFAIRS, ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, RETAIL SERVICES, RECREATION, FOOD AND NIGHT LIFE IN THE CITY OF HONOLULU | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1993 |
| 035 | CONDUCTING PERIODIC OPINION SURVEYS CONCERNING CITY LIFE, CIVIC AFFAIRS, ARTS AND ENTERTAINMENT, RETAIL SERVICES, RECREATION, FOOD AND NIGHT LIFE IN THE CITY OF HONOLULU | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1993 |
| 041 | PUBLICATION OF NEWSPAPERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 29, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Honolulu Weekly, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Honolulu Weekly, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Honolulu Weekly, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BEST OF HONOLULU
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 31, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Aug 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 13, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |