USPTO serial 76552567
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Sacramento, CA
Sacramento, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark C. Jacobs
MARK C JACOBS3033 EL CAMINO AVESACRAMENTO, CA 95821UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Valve controls for plumbing valves | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 4, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2007 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 15, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2007 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 25, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 3, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 8, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |