USPTO serial 76552577
S SAYRELYN'S CULINARY CLASSICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3184208Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 12, 2006
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with S SAYRELYN'S CULINARY CLASSICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Sharon Simpson Walter Simpson Madeline Hess and Harold Hess Partnership, The
Thousand Oaks, CA
Sharon Simpson Walter Simpson Madeline Hess and Harold Hess Partnership, The
Thousand Oaks, CA
Sharon Simpson, Walter Simpson, Madeline Hess, and Harold Hess
Thousand Oaks, CA
Other trademarks owned by Sharon Simpson, Walter Simpson, Madeline Hess, and Harold Hess
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dax Alvarez
DAX ALVAREZ BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN LLP12400 WILSHIRE BLVD SEVENTH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90025-1030UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Foods, namely, prepared meals consisting primarily of meats, fish poultry, and game; preserved, dried, and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, and fruit sauces; namely, applesauce and cranberry sauce; food package combinations consisting primarily of cheese, meat, and processed fruit; all the aforesaid goods sold exclusively through registrant's retail locations and through retail stores specializing in gourmet foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2004 |
| 030 | food package consisting primarily of bread, crackers, cakes, and cookies; prepared and packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta and rice; bread; rolls; bagels; bread sticks; stuffing mixes, containing bread; macaroni, rice and pasta salads; fruit sauces, namely,fig sauce, orange sauce, apricot sauce, and mango sauce; all the aforesaid goods sold exclusively through registrant's retail locations and through retail stores specializing in gourmet foods | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sharon Simpson Walter Simpson Madeline Hess and Harold Hess Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Sharon Simpson Walter Simpson Madeline Hess and Harold Hess Partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by Sharon Simpson, Walter Simpson, Madeline Hess, and Harold Hess
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named S SAYRELYN'S CULINARY CLASSICS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 2, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 21, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 3, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 28, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |