USPTO serial 76552637
MELODY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MELODY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Hsin Chuang City, Taipei Hsien, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David E. Dougherty
DAVID E DOUGHERTY LOWE HAUPTMAN BERNER LLP1700 DIAGONAL RD STE 300ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Shoes; boots; socks; stocking; suspenders; scarves; ties; bow ties; neckerchief; hats; caps; clothing, namely, sleepwear, bathrobes, undershirts, underwear, swimsuits, suits, vests, sweaters, shirts, T-shirts, over coats, vested suits, gowns, dresses, snow coats, feather coats, leather coats; gloves; and belts for clothing | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 21, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 3, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |