USPTO serial 76552718
VWK BY GVD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VWK BY GVD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
em CAMPO BOM (RS), BR
em CAMPO BOM (RS), BR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Faber
ROBERT C FABER OSTROLENK, FABER, GERB & SOFFEN LLP1180 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-8403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Footwear, namely boots, thongs, slippers, sandals and shoes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |