Drawing for ZUMANITY

USPTO serial 76552837

ZUMANITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZUMANITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica Riva Talley

Monica Riva Talley Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.1100 New York Avenue, N.W.Washington, DC 20005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Gaming machines; computer hardware and software for gaming machines; gaming accessories, namely, wireless key pads for use with computer gaming machines, magnetically encoded debit cards, money counting and sorting machines, mouse pads, electronic pensACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, casino servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 14, 2007EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 9, 2007EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2006EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2006EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Oct 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 26, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 3, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 16, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 16, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 25, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 5, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 5, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 24, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 4, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 24, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 1, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 3, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance