USPTO serial 76553545
ZONE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ZONE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Deborah L. Benson
DEBORAH L BENSON HINCIDEY, ALLEN & SNYDER LLP28 STATE STBOSTON, MA 02109-1775UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | non-medicated skin care preparations and cosmetics; non-medicated skin care preparations for animals, namely, shampoos, lotions, oils, ointments, creams, soaps, and conditioners | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Vitamins, nutritional supplements, nutritional food bars for use as a nutritional supplement or meal replacement and medicated cosmetics; feed supplements for pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | electronic publications, namely, magazines, a series of books, newsletters, and bulletins, all recorded on computer media, in the fields of diet, health and nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | printed materials, namely newsletters, magazines, and a series of books, all in the field of diet, health and nutrition | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish poultry, or vegetable; edible oils and fats; nutritional food bars, namely, protein based nutrient-dense meal snack bars | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Barry D. Sears, Ph.D.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Similar marks named ZONE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 10, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 5, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |