Drawing for THE BEAUTICIAN

USPTO serial 76553625

THE BEAUTICIAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, REBECCA A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BEAUTICIAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stewart L. Gitler

STEWART L GITLER HOFFMAN WASSON & GITLER PC2361 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY STE 522ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Electric hand held razors and trimmers, and electric manicure and pedicure setsACTIVE—
009Electric hand held curling irons and electric hand held flat ironsACTIVE—
010electric massage apparatus, namely, body, face and foot massagers; breast pads and facial toning machines for cosmetic useACTIVE—
011Electric hand held hair dryers, facial saunas and electric operated paraffin masks for skin treatmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 7, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 5, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 29, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 27, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance