USPTO serial 76553937
FISH HUNGRY BASTARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 4, 2007
- Examiner
- GAST, PAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with FISH HUNGRY BASTARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Harbinger, NC
Harbinger, NC
Harbinger, NC
Harbinger, NC
DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
HARBINGER, NC
Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
HARBINGER, NC
Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
HARBINGER, NC
Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
HARBINGER, NC
Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
HARBINGER, NC
Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
HARBINGER, NC
Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald C. Casey
Mitchell Wasson WELSH FLAXMAN & GITLER LLC2000 Duke StreetSuite 100Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Alexander, Debi
- Other trademarks owned by Deal, Charles
- Other trademarks owned by Alexander, Debi
- Other trademarks owned by Deal, Charles
- Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by DEBI ALEXANDRER AND CHARLES DEAL PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named FISH HUNGRY BASTARD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 10, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 22, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2005 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Nov 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |