USPTO serial 76554131
COS-50
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2006
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COS-50?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
PROFESSIONAL COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CEDAR HILL, TX
Other trademarks owned by PROFESSIONAL COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
PROFESSIONAL COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CEDAR HILL, TX
Other trademarks owned by PROFESSIONAL COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
PROFESSIONAL COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
CEDAR HILL, TX
Other trademarks owned by PROFESSIONAL COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GARY C. HONEYCUTT
GARY C HONEYCUTT GARY C. HONEYCUTT4728 RAVENDALERICHARDSON, TX 75082UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | ASPHALT COMPOSITION USED AS A SEAL COAT INTER-LOCKING EMULSION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFESSIONAL COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFESSIONAL COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PROFESSIONAL COATING TECHNOLOGIES INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named COS-50
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 29, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 27, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |