USPTO serial 76554266
DOÑA LITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 5, 2008
- Examiner
- SAUNDERS, ANDREA DAWN
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with DOÑA LITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Crio Inversiones, S.A. de C.V.
Antiguo Cuscatlan, SV
Crio Inversiones, S.A. de C.V.
Antiguo Cuscatlan, SV
Crio Inversiones, S.A. de C.V.
Antiguo Cuscatlan, SV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia M. O'Connor
Patricia M. O'Connor O'Connor Hernandez & Associates, P.A.999 Brickell AvenueSuite 740Miami, FL 33131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Candied fruits | ACTIVE | Dec 16, 2004 |
| 030 | Sweet breads, pastries and other breads with or without fruit filling; Cookies and other similar baked goods; Tortillas stuffed with meat, cheese, and/or vegetables namely 'pupusas'; Corn paste stuffed with meat, cheese, and/or vegetables, namely, 'tamales'; Other breads stuffed with meat, cheese, and/or vegetables; Pastries stuffed with fruit filling, namely, 'peperechas' | ACTIVE | Dec 16, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Crio Inversiones, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Crio Inversiones, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Crio Inversiones, S.A. de C.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named DOÑA LITA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 19, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 22, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 2, 2008 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 10, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 25, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 18, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |