Drawing for THE MERCHANDISER NEWSPAPERS "ADVERTISING NEWS CONSUMERS USE"

USPTO serial 76554285

THE MERCHANDISER NEWSPAPERS "ADVERTISING NEWS CONSUMERS USE"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE MERCHANDISER NEWSPAPERS "ADVERTISING NEWS CONSUMERS USE"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Newspapers primarily featuring classified advertisements and news articlesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 5, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 5, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 24, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 23, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 31, 2007PCDEPETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED—
Oct 5, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Aug 1, 2006PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Aug 1, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2006ZZBXALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-INADVERTENTLY ISSUED ACTION—
Jun 28, 2006PBSRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - SENIOR ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Jun 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 9, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 27, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 14, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 13, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 14, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 1, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 6, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 14, 2005FAXXFAX SENT—
Feb 14, 2005GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Feb 14, 2005CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 18, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 18, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 22, 2004FAXXFAX SENT—
Jul 18, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 20041.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Jul 1, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance