USPTO serial 76554304
BRUSH GLUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3218994Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BRUSH GLUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce L. Adams
Bruce L. Adams ADAMS & WILKS17 BATTERY PLACESUITE 1343NEW YORK, NY 10004-1162Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Adhesives for stationery or household purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 15, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 20, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 30, 2013 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS NOT UPDATED | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 26, 2013 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2013 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 25, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 6, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 7, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 27, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |