USPTO serial 76554617
UNION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Isle of Wight, P022 2DTR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D. ST. LANDAU
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED PREPARATIONS FOR THE CARE OF THE SKIN, FACE, HANDS,HAIR, SCALP AND BODY, NAMELY, LOTIONS, CLEANSERS, CREAMS, LOTIONS,MOISTURIZERS, MASKS AND TONERS; NON-MEDICATED TONICS FOR THE SKIN, BODY, FACE AND HANDS, NAMELY, LOTIONS AND EYE LOTIONS; EYE TREATMENTS, NAMELY, EYE MAKE-UP, EYE CREAMS; EYE REPAIR PREPARATIONS, NAMELY, EYE COMPRESSES FOR COSMETIC PURPOSES;SMOOTHING LINE SERUM, NAMELY, NON-MEDICATED SKIN SERUM;TREATMENTS FOR SPOTS AND BLEMISHES, NAMELY, AGE SPOT REDUCING CREAMS; COSMETICS; COSMETIC PREPARATIONS FOR SKIN RENEWAL; BODY SHIMMER COSMETICS, LIPSTICK, LIP GLOSS, LIP SHIMMER COSMETICS; LIP LINER; LIP PENCILS; EYE SHADOW; EYELINER; EYE PENCILS; MASCARA;FOUNDATION MAKE-UP; FACE POWDER; ROUGE; BLUSHER; MAKE-UP REMOVER; EYE MAKE-UP REMOVER; SOAPS FOR THE SKIN, BODY, FACE AND HANDS; SUNTANNING AND SUNSCREENING PREPARATIONS; PERFUMERY;DEODORANTS AND ANTIPERSPIRANTS; HAIR LOTIONS; SHAMPOO; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; TALCUM POWDER; DUSTING POWDER; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SCENTED PRODUCTS; VITAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE, NAMELY, VITAL OILS FOR THE BATH AND BATH OILS;VITAL OILS, NAMELY, HERBAL EXTRACTS FOR USE IN THE MANUFACTURE OF SCENTED PRODUCTS; DENTIFRICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | CANDLES; SCENTED CANDLES; WICKS FOR LIGHTING FOR USE IN OIL LAMPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | MEDICATED TONICS FOR THE SKIN, BODY, FACE AND HANDS, NAMELY LOTIONS, EYE REPAIR PREPARATIONS, NAMELY VISCOELASTIC AGENTS FOR EYE USE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |