USPTO serial 76554678
SOLREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOLREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William L. King III
WILLIAM L KING III LAW OFFICES OF KING & JOVANOVIC, PLC305 HOOVER BLVD STE 300HOLLAND, MI 49423UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | KITCHEN UTENSILS NAMELY, PIE SERVERS, TURNERS, SPATULAS, COOKING SPOONS, COOKING FORKS, UTILITY KNIVES, POTATO MASHERS, WHISKS, KITCHEN SCRUBBING BRUSHES, BASTING BRUSHES, VEGETABLE BRUSHES, COFFEE SCOOPS, COLANDERS, CORN COB HOLDERS, WIRE MESH FRYING SCREENS TO PREVENT SPLATTER, MEAT TENDERIZERS, MUGS, TEA KETTLES, TEA STRAINERS, TURKEY BASTERS, SEAFOOD PICKS, SCRAPER CHOPPERS, LADLES, SPAGHETTI SERVERS, SKIMMERS, BAKING UTENSILS NAMELY, ROLLING PINS, PASTRY BRUSHES AND SIFTERS, BARBECUE UTENSILS NAMELY, FORKS, TONGS, TURNERS,KITCHEN ITEMS NAMELY, MIXING BOWLS, COOKWARE, BAKE-WARE, KITCHEN POTS AND PANS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jan 27, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |