USPTO serial 76554688
GAYETY'S CHOCOLATES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3043319Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 17, 2006
- Examiner
- MATTHEWS, AMOS
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GAYETY'S CHOCOLATES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan Meyer
Susan Meyer Nixon Peabody LLP70 West Madison StreetSuite 3500, Attn: IP TM DocketChicago, IL 60602-4224Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | assorted chocolate covered fruit; assorted chocolate covered shelled raw and roasted nuts; honeycomb solid honey candy chips; chocolate covered almond candy; butter toffee chocolate candy; pecan caramel chocolate candy; assorted truffle candies; assorted chocolate-covered cream-filled candy; meltaway candy; old fashioned caramel candy; broken chocolate candy; non-pareils candy; assorted nougat candy; peanut butter cups; assorted pretzels; snack mixes consisting primarily of nuts and pretzels; assorted dark chocolate candy; chocolate covered fruits and pretzels; specialty molded chocolate candies; assorted coffee; assorted ice cream toppings, namely thick smooth syrups which are poured, containing butter, corn syrup and cane sugar, or corn syrup and cane sugar, or corn syrup, caramel and cane sugar, and flavored with 100% cocoa powder, pure natural vanilla bean extract, or sweetened cooked fruits such as strawberries and raspberries, and all of which are poured over ice cream to create ice cream sundaes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 1990 |
| 031 | [Jordan candy coated shelled raw almonds] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 15, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gayety Candy Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gayety Candy Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Gayety Candy Company, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named GAYETY'S CHOCOLATES
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 3, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Feb 7, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 19, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 27, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 13, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |