Drawing for MATRIX CYBER CAFE

USPTO serial 76554721

MATRIX CYBER CAFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MATRIX CYBER CAFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael Berns

MICHAEL BERNS MALONEY, PARKINSON & BERNS135 W MAIN STURBANA, IL 61801UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing multiple user dial-up and dedicated access to the InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Mar 16, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Mar 15, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 14, 2005GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 25, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 13, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance