Drawing for DROP 'N LOAD

USPTO serial 76554754

DROP 'N LOAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DROP 'N LOAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Barry A. Stein

BARRY A STEIN C/O CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHENSEVEN PENN CTR 12TH FL1635 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007NON-POWER OPERATED DISPENSING MACHINE FOR RECEIVING PACKAGED FLOWABLE MATERIALS IN THE NATURE OR LIQUIDS OR GRANULES WITH CUTTING BLADES TO OPEN THE PACKAGE AND DIRECT THE CONTENTS FOR DISPENSINGACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 19, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 19, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 20, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 17, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Dec 17, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 17, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 11, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 9, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 3, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 7, 2004XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 7, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 15, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance